Islam and civilization
Mohammed Shakir al-Sharif
With the many changes and developments on the reality of the Islamic nation poses some questions and says: «the road to civilization: Do you must pass through religious reform?». In the midst of this question provides some sentences judging which says: «Islam as a religion and as text sacred has become today hostage to readings and interpretations resulted in historical contexts saturated political conflict and tension in dealing with different intellectual, sectarian and religious» and that there «read militant and marginal to the text are the reference prevailing BTA Islamic intellectual and political talk and we now need to «cultural reading of the text put values to communicate with the world, and the values of freedom and tolerance to many such sentences.
This question - including covered from previous sentences - needs to answer to know what is meant by 'civilization' and what is meant by the 'Reformation' as a prerequisite to produce speech utility.«Religious reform» term Western grew up in the West for their own reasons, and gave results appropriate for their situation; it is no longer a secret that consignments prior to Islam had income distortion, which enter so they range from humans, no doubt that their knowledge in the highest degree not to exceed collect scientific material available in their time, but what will be the state of science after a century or two or ten centuries no one knows but he who created the heavens and the earth and gave the material properties, and deposited the laws harnessed even discovered takes the reasons leading to it. I say: Because distortion have been in those times, advanced; was not able to foresees the possibility of scientific development, has a line of science after rid of Aristotelian logic and headed to the experimental method thanks to the contributions of Muslim Scholars - a line strides yielded crack great in the fence, which combines religion Christian and worldly knowledge. It was between the parties مخاصمات severe to the extent of loss of life, not concern us delve into the details of it, but it is important that we say: call «religious reform» grew up in this atmosphere that was most famously call (Martin Luther), which arose from what was known doctrine Protestant. The book was «sacred» when Christians do not interpret nor understood only priests, Faihlon what they want and are denied what they want, and pointing or mistaken what they want of things scientific, came Martin Luther invitation «religious reform», which means in the first founded by lifting the tutelage of priests about the book «Bible There should be a free reading away from the heritage and interpretations and explanations of priests.
Today, intended us to deal with our deal (Martin Luther) and his followers with their religion. And people with their passion clicks of accept it all, and they want to imitate him in everything, and where we are is from this section, otherwise it is who can give us the evidence right - away from the speech sender on the face - «that Islam hostage to readings and interpretations resulted in historical contexts was saturated with political conflict and tension with different intellectual and religious. It tells us that the «Islamic reference is the result of reading and marginal militant text?». This speech is an insult against the Islam before the cup in scientists; that religious texts that are not a function of the facts in a way can not be hands of shadowy nullity and fade, is unfit to be our always-year over the expansion of time and space; therefore was consignments previous timed to the possibility of entering distortion, and Islam can not be attributed to him not then aware that several centuries until the nation comes from discovering this amazing discovery is «that Islam as a religion and as a hostage to texts readings ... Etc. »- To say so would mean a priori - as he sees Qaúloh - that Islam is preserved and is subject to distortion Kalrsalat previous; This is contrary to the saying - the Almighty -: {I mentioned we went to him and I privates} and contrary to talk multiple Messenger of Allah peace be upon him by all in the box «that the nation does not agree on the error.
The Muslims all Muslims are invited to read the legal text and ponder and act upon it, and not limited to a certain class as the Christians. How allegedly control «marginal militant read the text? Can someone explain to us the owners of that perception there are multiple schools of jurisprudence in legal text and deal with it from the time of the companions to this day? He was the commander of the faithful is the Supreme Head of the state that does not impose his opinion or diligence on Muslims, famously says: 'common opinion', If we were to trace the long-Us place; There is no strict reading or mono or other expressions.There is no doubt complex matters between scholars of all sects, and there is known of the religion; does is read militant Oouhdih or monochrome text? If that meant the required permission demolition of religion and convert to another religion, and outside the circle of the compound upon information necessarily religion. Governing jurisprudence scholars famous base says: «we speak right potentially error, and the words of others error likely right» or «this the best of what we estimated it, It came to us with the best of it we have accepted it.
Finally, we say: Is the description of both did not condemn the religion of Islam, who in their call that they Kfar - Is this reading-saturated Balaanqan militant in dealing with others as Alzaamon claims? Did not God - the Almighty -: {have disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary} Is there a meaning to this verse is what is indicated by appear ألفاظها? Did not God - the Almighty -: {not Taatkhaddoa Jews and Christians parents} and many verses like that? Is there a sense that appears of ألفاظها, do you say that Jews and Christians are enemies of Muslims, and it should not be Ntakzhm parents - Is that strict reading of the text? Will history has shown love the Jews and the Christians and their devotion to us?!
See to the Inquisition in Andalusia (Spain) and look at the Crusades, which lasted nearly two centuries, and look at the war on Afghanistan and then Iraq with the threat to the rest of the Islamic world, not to mention what does the Jews in Palestine, and then look at the colonial era: Which came of their own countries? Are they came carrying a message is the occupation and looting and killing of men, women and children? Are they justified in the occupation of our country for decades and steal the wealth of the country and its resources? Who did it? Are not they are Christians? However we are required to read our texts read civilized! Read entrench values of love of enemies instead of hate, and the values of loyalty, rather than hostility, and the values of doubt as to our axioms rather than stability, and the values of delivery beliefs of others corrupt rather than revoked and respond to it, and in the opposite side we find Bush, Blair and Berlusconi, Chirac and many others are sticking Beslipem face Muslims!
The civilization is not in affect architecture and breadth of the streets and the spread of the means of communication developed and so on, but to the side so it must be a constant values as faith, honesty, justice and the fulfillment of pledges, cooperation and respect for the dignity sons of Adam, which makes those achievements tool for good and righteousness, not tools of evil and corruption and destruction as is the case in contemporary Western culture.
Perhaps we may then say: The question that opened its article question is flawed, was right to say: The road to civilization real outlive not spoil, which serve not spoil, and that is equivalent to or grievance, and that leads humanity into world and the Hereafter , not to unhappiness minimum and misery Hereafter is civilization that pass through the commitment the religion of Islam, and should then be the question that look to him for an answer and realistic achievable is: what mechanisms that should be followed to return our nation to its debt return true at the grassroots level, and at the official level political and institutional systems through clear and specific take Sharia platform and base?
Mohammed Shakir al-Sharif
With the many changes and developments on the reality of the Islamic nation poses some questions and says: «the road to civilization: Do you must pass through religious reform?». In the midst of this question provides some sentences judging which says: «Islam as a religion and as text sacred has become today hostage to readings and interpretations resulted in historical contexts saturated political conflict and tension in dealing with different intellectual, sectarian and religious» and that there «read militant and marginal to the text are the reference prevailing BTA Islamic intellectual and political talk and we now need to «cultural reading of the text put values to communicate with the world, and the values of freedom and tolerance to many such sentences.
This question - including covered from previous sentences - needs to answer to know what is meant by 'civilization' and what is meant by the 'Reformation' as a prerequisite to produce speech utility.«Religious reform» term Western grew up in the West for their own reasons, and gave results appropriate for their situation; it is no longer a secret that consignments prior to Islam had income distortion, which enter so they range from humans, no doubt that their knowledge in the highest degree not to exceed collect scientific material available in their time, but what will be the state of science after a century or two or ten centuries no one knows but he who created the heavens and the earth and gave the material properties, and deposited the laws harnessed even discovered takes the reasons leading to it. I say: Because distortion have been in those times, advanced; was not able to foresees the possibility of scientific development, has a line of science after rid of Aristotelian logic and headed to the experimental method thanks to the contributions of Muslim Scholars - a line strides yielded crack great in the fence, which combines religion Christian and worldly knowledge. It was between the parties مخاصمات severe to the extent of loss of life, not concern us delve into the details of it, but it is important that we say: call «religious reform» grew up in this atmosphere that was most famously call (Martin Luther), which arose from what was known doctrine Protestant. The book was «sacred» when Christians do not interpret nor understood only priests, Faihlon what they want and are denied what they want, and pointing or mistaken what they want of things scientific, came Martin Luther invitation «religious reform», which means in the first founded by lifting the tutelage of priests about the book «Bible There should be a free reading away from the heritage and interpretations and explanations of priests.
Today, intended us to deal with our deal (Martin Luther) and his followers with their religion. And people with their passion clicks of accept it all, and they want to imitate him in everything, and where we are is from this section, otherwise it is who can give us the evidence right - away from the speech sender on the face - «that Islam hostage to readings and interpretations resulted in historical contexts was saturated with political conflict and tension with different intellectual and religious. It tells us that the «Islamic reference is the result of reading and marginal militant text?». This speech is an insult against the Islam before the cup in scientists; that religious texts that are not a function of the facts in a way can not be hands of shadowy nullity and fade, is unfit to be our always-year over the expansion of time and space; therefore was consignments previous timed to the possibility of entering distortion, and Islam can not be attributed to him not then aware that several centuries until the nation comes from discovering this amazing discovery is «that Islam as a religion and as a hostage to texts readings ... Etc. »- To say so would mean a priori - as he sees Qaúloh - that Islam is preserved and is subject to distortion Kalrsalat previous; This is contrary to the saying - the Almighty -: {I mentioned we went to him and I privates} and contrary to talk multiple Messenger of Allah peace be upon him by all in the box «that the nation does not agree on the error.
The Muslims all Muslims are invited to read the legal text and ponder and act upon it, and not limited to a certain class as the Christians. How allegedly control «marginal militant read the text? Can someone explain to us the owners of that perception there are multiple schools of jurisprudence in legal text and deal with it from the time of the companions to this day? He was the commander of the faithful is the Supreme Head of the state that does not impose his opinion or diligence on Muslims, famously says: 'common opinion', If we were to trace the long-Us place; There is no strict reading or mono or other expressions.There is no doubt complex matters between scholars of all sects, and there is known of the religion; does is read militant Oouhdih or monochrome text? If that meant the required permission demolition of religion and convert to another religion, and outside the circle of the compound upon information necessarily religion. Governing jurisprudence scholars famous base says: «we speak right potentially error, and the words of others error likely right» or «this the best of what we estimated it, It came to us with the best of it we have accepted it.
Finally, we say: Is the description of both did not condemn the religion of Islam, who in their call that they Kfar - Is this reading-saturated Balaanqan militant in dealing with others as Alzaamon claims? Did not God - the Almighty -: {have disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary} Is there a meaning to this verse is what is indicated by appear ألفاظها? Did not God - the Almighty -: {not Taatkhaddoa Jews and Christians parents} and many verses like that? Is there a sense that appears of ألفاظها, do you say that Jews and Christians are enemies of Muslims, and it should not be Ntakzhm parents - Is that strict reading of the text? Will history has shown love the Jews and the Christians and their devotion to us?!
See to the Inquisition in Andalusia (Spain) and look at the Crusades, which lasted nearly two centuries, and look at the war on Afghanistan and then Iraq with the threat to the rest of the Islamic world, not to mention what does the Jews in Palestine, and then look at the colonial era: Which came of their own countries? Are they came carrying a message is the occupation and looting and killing of men, women and children? Are they justified in the occupation of our country for decades and steal the wealth of the country and its resources? Who did it? Are not they are Christians? However we are required to read our texts read civilized! Read entrench values of love of enemies instead of hate, and the values of loyalty, rather than hostility, and the values of doubt as to our axioms rather than stability, and the values of delivery beliefs of others corrupt rather than revoked and respond to it, and in the opposite side we find Bush, Blair and Berlusconi, Chirac and many others are sticking Beslipem face Muslims!
The civilization is not in affect architecture and breadth of the streets and the spread of the means of communication developed and so on, but to the side so it must be a constant values as faith, honesty, justice and the fulfillment of pledges, cooperation and respect for the dignity sons of Adam, which makes those achievements tool for good and righteousness, not tools of evil and corruption and destruction as is the case in contemporary Western culture.
Perhaps we may then say: The question that opened its article question is flawed, was right to say: The road to civilization real outlive not spoil, which serve not spoil, and that is equivalent to or grievance, and that leads humanity into world and the Hereafter , not to unhappiness minimum and misery Hereafter is civilization that pass through the commitment the religion of Islam, and should then be the question that look to him for an answer and realistic achievable is: what mechanisms that should be followed to return our nation to its debt return true at the grassroots level, and at the official level political and institutional systems through clear and specific take Sharia platform and base?
.jpg)
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق